I personally think it would be terrible if the backlash for the Gaza holocaust leads to attacks on civilians. I personally do not believe any amount of violence no matter how horrific would excuse acts of collective punishment targeting civilians in the way Israel has been targeting civilian populations with deadly force in Gaza. But we all know such attacks are probably going to happen at some point, and it isn’t my reasoning which says that the perpetrators would bear no culpability for their actions. This is the reasoning of the Israel apologists. If you believe Hamas is to blame for Israel’s actions in Gaza, then by your own logic you must necessarily accept that Israel is to blame for any backlash against those actions. If you don’t accept this then you are admitting your position isn’t guided by reasoning at all, and that you simply believe Israel should magically be able to inflict as much butchery and suffering on civilians as it likes without ever creating any natural consequences or backlash of any kind. Your mind exists in a fantasy world wherein Israel has some kind of divinely ordained exclusive right to violent force. In the early months of the Gaza genocide, Palestine supporters began pointing out the contradictory logic which holds that nothing Israel did could justify October 7, but October 7 justifies anything Israel might do. At no time have Israel apologists ever deviated from this line of reasoning. This self-contradictory position has now become the official line at the White House, where all questions from the press about Israel’s atrocities in Gaza are met by assertions from Trump’s podium people that all blame for those atrocities rests exclusively at the feet of Hamas. By that exact same logic, any blame for the violent extremism and antisemitism which is going to ensue from Israel’s actions in Gaza rests exclusively at the feet of Israel. This isn’t my reasoning. It’s theirs.One of the most evil tankies. pic.twitter.com/tlRbF2TnF4
— Drew Pavlou ?????? (@DrewPavlou) April 20, 2025
In reality it has always been baby-brained thinking to begin the historical record at the moment of the most recent aggression and pretend Hamas attacked an innocent Israel completely unprovoked. It’s a narrative promoted by predatory manipulators and believed by weak-minded human livestock; Israel was horrifically abusive to the people of Gaza prior to October 7, and had been routinely attacking and killing Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank in the months prior. Israel apologists yell “Blame Hamas!” whenever people decry the genocidal atrocities taking place in Gaza in order to excuse Israel from its obvious culpability in those crimes. But it’s a paper-thin argument which can’t withstand the slightest amount of critical thought. You can’t whatabout your way into genocide being morally defensible. That is not a thing. Read more at: CaitlinJohnstone.com.auWe have arrived at an absurd rule: Nothing justifies October 7, but in the name of October 7 everything is justifiable. There's no security justification for such massive bombing. No military action can justify bombing helpless human beings / @Ahmad_tibihttps://t.co/oJsQc8NIXY
— Haaretz.com (@haaretzcom) December 22, 2024
Common cosmetic and food packaging chemical blamed for deadly heart disease surge
By Cassie B. // Share
By News Editors // Share
Fennel for painful periods: A clinically proven drug alternative
By News Editors // Share
Nova festival founder exposed as key player in Israeli intelligence’s Gaza genocide campaign
By Lance D Johnson // Share
If October 7 justifies the Gaza genocide, what acts of violence will the Gaza genocide justify?
By newseditors // Share
By newseditors // Share
Ultra-processed foods and poor sleep: Breaking the link through dietary choices
By willowt // Share
Measles cases in Texas rise to 663: But is the MMR vaccine really the answer?
By ljdevon // Share