Geoengineers plot to poison the skies: Boeing 777s may soon dump toxic sulfur, risking acid rain catastrophe

By ljdevon // 2025-05-01

Mastodon

Parler

Gab

Copy

In a controversial bid to cool the planet, scientists are now proposing retrofitting fleets of Boeing 777s to spray massive quantities of sulfur dioxide into the stratosphere—a plan that could unleash acid rain on a global scale. Shockingly, this method would require three times more toxic aerosols than high-altitude alternatives, amplifying risks to human health and fragile ecosystems. Even more alarming? Researchers openly admit the scheme would 'strongly increase side-effects' like environmental devastation, yet powerful interests are pushing ahead regardless. Behind closed doors, global elites are fast-tracking these radical geoengineering experiments under the benign label of 'climate intervention,' sidestepping democratic debate and ignoring the potential for irreversible harm. Are we trading one catastrophe for another? Key Points:

Scientists propose retrofitting Boeing 777s to spray sulfur dioxide into the stratosphere, risking acid rain and environmental devastation.
The plan requires three times more toxic aerosol than high-altitude methods, increasing health and ecological hazards.
Researchers admit the scheme would "strongly increase side-effects such as acid rain"—yet push forward anyway.
Global elites are fast-tracking geoengineering under the guise of "climate intervention," bypassing public scrutiny.

A reckless gamble with the planet

In a brazen move that defies both science and sanity, geoengineers are now pushing to weaponize commercial airliners in a radical experiment to alter Earth’s climate. A new study published in Earth’s Future reveals plans to retrofit Boeing 777 jets to dump millions of tons of sulfur dioxide into the lower stratosphere—a scheme that could trigger catastrophic acid rain, poison ecosystems, and accelerate the very environmental collapse it claims to prevent. The study, authored by researchers from University College London and Yale, admits the plan would "strongly increase side-effects such as acid rain" due to the sheer volume of sulfur required. Unlike high-altitude aerosol injection (SAI), which requires specialized aircraft, this shortcut relies on existing jets flying at just 42,000 feet—ensuring the toxic particles rain down faster and in greater concentrations. The irony is staggering: To "save" the planet from climate change, they’re willing to flood it with poison.

A blueprint for disaster

The study’s authors openly concede that their low-altitude sulfur-dumping strategy is "sub-optimal"—meaning it’s less effective, more dangerous, and disproportionately harms polar regions. Yet they advocate for it anyway, citing "lower technical barriers" and the ability to deploy faster. Key dangers include:

Acid rain devastation: Sulfur dioxide reacts with water vapor to form sulfuric acid, which destroys forests, contaminates water supplies, and erodes infrastructure.
Human health risks: Increased exposure to particulate matter linked to respiratory diseases, heart conditions, and premature death.
Unilateral deployment: The study warns of a "greater risk of unilateral deployment"—meaning rogue nations or corporations could hijack the skies without global oversight.

This isn’t science. It’s a corporate-military power grab disguised as environmentalism.

History repeats itself: From cloud seeding to sky poisoning

The push for geoengineering is nothing new. For decades, global elites have weaponized weather under the guise of "environmental stewardship." In the 20th century, cloud seeding was used to manipulate rainfall. Now, they’ve escalated to stratospheric aerosol injection—a far more dangerous game. The study compares the sulfur output to the 1991 Mount Pinatubo eruption, which temporarily cooled the planet but also triggered widespread acid rain and ozone depletion. Yet, unlike a natural disaster, this would be a permanent, man-made atmospheric regime—one that, once started, cannot be stopped without triggering "termination shock"—a sudden, catastrophic warming spike.

Who stands to profit?

The geoengineering-industrial complex is already lining up for taxpayer-funded contracts. Britain’s Aria agency is preparing field experiments, while defense contractors and aerospace giants like Boeing could cash in on retrofitting fleets. Meanwhile, the public is kept in the dark. No democratic debate. No informed consent. Just a silent coup against the sky itself.

The bottom line: A crime against nature

This isn’t about saving the planet. It’s about control—engineering dependence on a toxic, irreversible atmospheric intervention. The same corporate and governmental forces that wrecked the environment with industrialization now seek to "fix" it by dousing the skies in sulfur. As the study admits, this plan is flawed, dangerous, and inefficient—yet it’s being fast-tracked anyway. The question isn’t whether they can do it. The question is: Will we let them, or will government enforce new state laws combating geoengineering? Sources include: JonFleetwood.substack.com AGUPubs.wiley.com Enoch, Brighteon.ai